Sometimes
it is helpful to view things from an unusual perspective.
What I often miss in the views of many
politicians is a feeling how others, like their opponents (but not only their
opponents), who are affected by their measures, judge these measures and the
ideas behind them. Not few politicians think that what they do is superior and
that others must adapt, and if they don’t that they must be punished. Only few
politicians can place themselves in the shoes of their opponents and those
affected by their decisions. They cannot take the perspective of the other, as
it is called in psychology. It’s not that they must agree with these others,
but having a feeling for their viewpoints, especially those viewpoints they
don’t agree with, will make their decisions more sensible.
Taking the perspective of the other involves putting yourself in the position
of the other and trying to imagine how this person sees the world from his
perspective and especially how he sees you. It also involves understanding the
feelings belonging to that position. So, if a small country is attacked by a
big neighbour, and you want to mediate in the conflict, you must not only see
it as a clash on a political chessboard that can be solved if both parties give
in a bit, or take the stalemate on the battlefield as a starting point without
taking the reasons and causes of the conflict into account. You need also take
account of the different views of the warring parties. For instance, you as a
mediator should understand that the big neighbour is a former superpower who
wants to restore the position it once had and that it wants to “collect” a
series of weak vassal states at its borders, while the small attacked country
is desperately asking your support, in order to keep the freedom it acquired 30
years ago, when it became independent of the big neighbour that now tries to
undo its liberty and independence.
Taking the perspective of the other makes that you get a better and multi-sided
view on the problem at hand and on the consequences of the actions you want to
perform. It helps avoid the mistake of seeing what others do only from your
perspective, by thinking that your view on the world is the way everybody sees
it. It makes you aware of what other people see and how they see it. So, it is
not a matter of taking merely the place of another and look at the world
from there with your ideas, but you must look around from that position with their
ideas. In this way, you’ll not only have a better feeling for what others do
and why, but you’ll also get more information, and you will be better able to
interact with others. You’ll have a better understanding of those you interact
with. As David W. Johnson writes in Psychology
Today: “Once people can view the issue and situation both from their
own perspective and the other persons’ perspectives, they can more easily find
mutually beneficial solutions. Perspective-taking also communicates that one
really understands their thoughts, feelings, and needs. It is usually easier to
jointly solve a problem when the other people feel understood and respected.”
For politicians, taking the perspective of the other is not only a matter of
the right attitude, but also a matter of being surrounded by the right persons,
especially by the right advisors. By right advisors I don’t mean only advisors
who basically agree with you but just also advisors that do not. It is
important to have around you also advisors who are critical of your views and who
can formulate alternative possibilities; possibilities you may not agree with
initially. Such advisors help develop broad, multi-sided views. This is
important since it helps make political decision makers aware 1) that everyone
has a unique perspective; 2) that perspectives are dependent on a person’s
experiences, expectations and goals; 3) that the same message can mean two
entirely different things from two different perspectives; and 4) it helps avoid
the misunderstanding that everybody sees things from the same perspective as you
do, (see Psychology
Today)
Generally, the effects of perspective taking are positive. 1) It improves
communication and reduces misunderstandings and distortions. 2) It is essential
for a realistic assessment of common and opposed interests and an accurate
assessment of their validity and relative merits. Without a realistic view
lasting agreements and solutions are hardly possible. 3) If you want to
influence others, you need to have a feeling what they stand for and to feel
the emotional force with which they believe in it. 4) Engaging in
perspective-taking tends to improve the relationship with the other person. You
are more liked and respected when the other sees that you know his perspective
and takes it into consideration.
Some politicians do what you like and like what they do, without taking care
what others and especially their opponents and victims think of it. At first,
this egomania may be effective, but then those affected will look for
countermeasures, or ways to ignore them and leave them alone. (see Psychology
Today)