After Charles IX, only 14 years old, had become
King of France in 1560, he made a tour through the country in order to have his
kingship recognized by the local authorities. He made also an entry of state in
Bordeaux, the town where the French philosopher Michel de Montaigne lived then.
The political elite organised a grand reception for the young king, including a
long procession. The parade included a group of prisoners from twelve countries
accompanied by 300 soldiers. The prisoners were Greek, Turks. Arabs etc. but
also Indians from Brazil, so from the just discovered New World. All wore their
national costumes and their leaders held speeches in their own languages. How
pity that we don’t know anymore what they said.
It was there that Montaigne met the Indians
he tells us about fourteen years later in his essay “Of Cannibals”. Montaigne writes
there that the King talked with three of them a great while and that the Indians
were shown the town and shown how the people lived. Next they were asked what
they thought of what they had seen and what had surprised them. They mentioned
three points, but after 14 years Montaigne had forgotten one of them. These are
their other observations according to Montaigne :
“They said, that in the first place they
thought it very strange that so many tall men, wearing beards, strong, and well
armed, who were about the king (‘tis like they meant the Swiss of the guard),
should submit to obey a child, and that they did not rather choose out one
amongst themselves to command. Secondly (they have a way of speaking in their language
to call men the half of one another), that they had observed that there were
amongst us men full and crammed with all manner of commodities, whilst, in the
meantime, their halves were begging at their doors, lean and half-starved with
hunger and poverty; and they thought it strange that these necessitous halves
were able to suffer so great an inequality and injustice, and that they did not
take the others by the throats, or set fire to their houses.”
It is not unlikely that the Indians really criticized
the French society in this way, but I wonder whether Montaigne didn’t mention
just this passage from what the Indians replied because it was his own opinion
and because it indirectly refered to what his late friend Étienne de La Boétie wrote
about society in his The discourse of
voluntary servitude. For isn’t it so that the Essays, to which his “Of Cannibals” belong, are dedicated to La
Boétie? Probably most readers of his time would immediately understand
Montaigne’s silent reference to his friend. This is what La Boétie wrote:
“I come now to a point which is ... the secret of domination, the support and
foundation of tyranny. Whoever thinks that halberds, sentries, the placing of
the watch, serve to protect and shield tyrants is ... completely mistaken.
These are used ... more for ceremony and a show of force than for any reliance
placed in them. The archers forbid the entrance to the palace to the poorly
dressed who have no weapons, not to the well armed who can carry out some plot.
... [I]t is not arms that defend the tyrant. ... [T]here are only four or five
who maintain the dictator, four or five who keep the country in bondage to him.
Five or six have always had access to his ear, and have either gone to him of
their own accord, or else have been summoned by him, to be accomplices in his
cruelties, companions in his pleasures, panders to his lusts, and sharers in
his plunders. These six manage their chief so successfully that he comes to be
held accountable not only for his own misdeeds but even for theirs. The six
have six hundred who profit under them, and with the six hundred they do what
they have accomplished with their tyrant. The six hundred maintain under them
six thousand, whom they promote in rank, upon whom they confer the government
of provinces or the direction of finances, in order that they may serve as
instruments of avarice and cruelty, executing orders at the proper time and
working such havoc all around that they could not last except under the shadow
of the six hundred, nor be exempt from law and punishment except through their
influence. ... [In this way] not the six thousand but a hundred thousand, and
even millions, cling to the tyrant by this cord to which they are tied.”
To my view, this is what Montaigne probably
wanted to say in his essay “Of Cannibals”. This is how he saw society. Changes
are necessary, but change is not simply a matter of substituting the puppets. So
it has no sense that the guard kills the tyrant and choose their own leader. How
society works depends on a complicated structure of dependence. Is it different
in present-day society even though it is more complicated? In the end we don’t
obey voluntarily but everybody is tied to someone else like a puppet on a
string.
Sources:
- La Boétie, Étienne de, The discourse of voluntary servitude. Quoted from an English version that I
downloaded to my PC already many years ago. Sorry, I couldn’t find the Internet
link, but there are several other good translations available.
- Montaigne, Michel de, “Of Cannibals”, Chapter
XXXX in his Essays. Quoted from the Gutenberg edition, English version,
on http://www.gutenberg.org/files/3600/3600-h/3600-h.htm#link2HCH0030
No comments:
Post a Comment