Oradour-sur-Glane,
France: Massacred and destroyed by the Nazis out of revenge,
10 June 1944.
Being moral or
exercising power. Often it is a contradiction and often we think that there is
no other option than to choose the one or the other; in daily life, let alone
as a politician, certainly if you are a politician at the top of the – or a –
power structure. And how often don’t we opt for power instead of morality? I am
afraid that too often we do. Especially, many at the top choose power, even in
case morality is a real option.
I had to think of this when, two weeks ago, I saw Monteverdi’s opera L’Incoronazione
di Poppea in the City Theatre of Utrecht, performed by the Dutch Touring
Opera. The opera was first performed in 1643 in Venice. The musical
introduction to the opera presents it as a battle between morality and love, in
which love wins, but actually the opera is about morality and power, and, as so
often, power wins. I think it is what Claudio Monteverdi (1567-1643) wanted to
tell us, but in his time, in Italy in the first part of the 16th century, often
you could not say your message openly, so he concealed the real message behind
a more innocent theme, namely the struggle between Virtu and Amor.
But first the story (from the website above):
The Roman emperor Nero is in love with the courtesan Poppea. He wants to take
her to wife and cast off his lawful wife Ottavia. Nero’s teacher Seneca
considers these plans morally and politically objectionable and must pay for
his opposition with forced suicide. The desperate Ottavia decides to have
Poppea murdered and forces Otto, Poppea’s former lover, to perform the attack.
Otto seeks the help of Drusilla, whom he had left for Poppea at the time. Torn
with love and resentment, Otto, wrapped in Drusilla’s cloak, sneaks up on the
sleeping Poppea. However, the murder is foiled by Amor, who promises to ensure
that Poppea is crowned Empress that same day. Drusilla, whose cloak has been
recognized, is arrested and taken to Nero, who questions her sharply. To protect
Otto, she takes all the blame. When Otto hears this, he tells the true facts.
He is exiled, and Drusilla may accompany him as a reward for her loyalty. Nero
now has good reason to cast out Ottavia and banishes her from Rome for good,
and Poppea is crowned empress.
In short, L’Incoronazione di Poppea is an opera in which moral values
are put aside and power, greed and relations determine what the personages do. At
first sight, it seems like another fictional complicated opera story, but in
fact it is based on historical facts. Nero really did take Poppea, the wife of
his friend Otto, for instance, and cast out his wife Ottavia. And Seneca, the
teacher of Nero, was really forced to commit suicide, though in reality because
Nero thought that he had taken part in a conspiracy (whether Seneca really did is
not certain). Etc. But what Monteverdi (and his librettist Giovanni Francesco
Busenello) presents us here actually is a complicated network of power and
intrigues. Ted Huffman, the director of this performance of the opera, explains
that the opera is about political and moral questions that are still relevant
today: “At the moment that Europe balances on the brink of war, we are
concerned with questions such as: What happens if our moral values are no
longer worth anything? … What can we do, while we see that the world order
collapses? Can reason and goodness stop the decline? How to deal with the
violent destruction of a social order by a psychopathic autocrat? Just these
are the questions presented by Monteverdi in the opera.” But actually, it is
not only Nero, it is not only the autocrat, who uses power at the cost of
morality, but all those who become included in the play and so get involved in
it, are not only onlookers and victims. They are participants. Huffman: “For
example, is it so that Poppea becomes immoral, because Nero uses all his means
to separate from his wife Ottavia, so that he can marry Poppea, … [or] is it so
that Poppea can live with Nero’s misdeeds and abuse of power? We can ask such
questions also for other personages. Take Seneca: Isn’t it maybe so that he
tried to prevent the repudiation of Ottavia in order to keep his own power at
the court?” We can say something like that of every personage in the opera:
Each one thinks to have reasons to use power at the cost of morality. “None of
the characters in the opera thinks to be guilty or blameworthy – just like in
real life, when nobody wants to be the bad guy”, and, as I want to add, nobody
thinks to be a bad guy or bad girl. This is so for Poppea, and for Seneca and
for all characters in the opera. Nobody, once involved in the play, considers
the possibility that there may be other options and everybody stays on the
stage and plays his or her part. Nevertheless, other options were possible, for
wasn’t it so that a few years later the real historic Nero was deposed by the
Senate (the equivalent of the modern parliament or Congress) because of his
misconduct? Power doesn’t need to exclude morality. It’s something to think
about, even when you have become involved in a play in which you didn’t want to
have a part.
Need I explain more about the relevance of