Most blogs I have written here about the question what
a person is are about personal identity in time. So they go into the question
what makes that I am still the same person as many years ago. Another question
is what the characteristics of personhood are, so what distinguishes a person
from a non-person, like, for instance, a human being from an animal (or from most
animals, for some animals certainly have personhood in a way). This question
was dealt with by J. David Velleman in his recent article “Sociality and
solitude”. I shall not discuss the article here, but the following passage
caught my eye. It says a lot about who we are as a person:
Visiting a museum is
a human sort of grazing, but visiting with a companion is not just a case of
grazing in the same place …; it is a
case of two going together … The mere personhood of another person, which makes
him eligible for going together, is of value even in the absence of any
personal relationship. (p. 332)
Velleman is referring here to Aristotle’s description
of friendship. Aristotle sees friendship as “two going together”, which he
contrasts with “the case of cattle, grazing in the same place”. Grazing cows in
a herd are doing the same: grazing. But each cow grazes for herself. Cows in a
herd do not have a common (or joint) intention, but they have an intention in
common. (ibid.)
Also man can behave like a grazing cow in a herd and he
often does! For instance, when someone walks alone through a museum and looks
at the paintings one after another while ignoring the other visitors present.
But it doesn’t need to be a mere individual activity. The same action can be
done together with a friend, wife or husband, child, and so on. Then one has a
joint intention performed in a joint action, and usually one talks with the
partner about what one sees. This possibility of having a common intention – to
be distinguished from an intention in common – is a characteristic of
personhood, so Velleman, and I agree. It doesn’t need to be so that one jointly
shares attentions only with people one knows. If I want to bring the piano
upstairs I can hire a hand for helping me. I don’t need to know the guy, as
long as he is prepared to help me for a remuneration.
As Velleman states, this characteristic of personhood does
not need to present itself continuously and openly. It doesn’t need to be
manifest. It can also be latent and come to the surface at the right moment.
Let’s say that we are grazing the paintings in a museum and then we make a
remark to another visitor about a certain painting. A conversation starts and
we walk together through the museum discussing about what we see. So a sudden
and temporary kind of friendship or companionship comes into being, which
probably ends when we leave the museum. Cows will not do that. They’ll not
start to talk about the grass, showing another cow the place where the grass is
best. In this sense cows don’t have personhood, while man has. And have you
ever seen a cow making a meal for the herd?
No comments:
Post a Comment