Ludwig Wittgenstein and Georg Henrik von Wright (right)
Sometimes first encounters are quite dramatic. Take
for example the first encounter between the Finnish philosopher Georg Henrik
von Wright and Ludwig Wittgenstein. When von Wright arrived in Cambridge, UK,
early May 1939, in order to prepare his dissertation, he heard that
Wittgenstein was giving lectures. Of course, he wanted to attend these
lectures, although the running class had already almost finished. Let’s see
what von Wright tells us about it:
“My first encounter
with Wittgenstein was rather dramatic. I went to his lecture ..., introduced
myself when he entered, and said that I had the chairman’s permission to attend
lectures in the faculty. Wittgenstein murmured something in reply which I did
not understand, and I seated myself among the audience. He started to lecture
and I became at once fascinated. ... At the end of the lecture, however,
Wittgenstein expressed his great annoyance at the presence of ‘visitors’ in his
class. He seemed furious. Then he left the room without waiting for an apology
or explanation. I was hurt and shocked. My first impulse was to give up efforts
to approach this strange man. But I also wanted a straightforward answer as to
whether I could come to his lectures or not. So I wrote him a letter [not
expecting an answer. However,] a few days later I got a friendly reply from the
man whom I had so angered.” (pp. 10-11) This led to a personal encounter
between them, and although Wittgenstein didn’t like von Wright’s presence in this class, he was welcome to visit the
next series of lectures.
This first rather dramatic meeting between two
outstanding philosophers – one who had already established his fame; the other
would soon do so – became the start of a long lasting friendship. After Wittgenstein’s
death von Wright became his successor in Cambridge and moreover he became one
of the executors of Wittgenstein’s literary legacy. What would have happened if
von Wright had not sent a letter to Wittgenstein after his rejection? Actually,
I am a bit surprised about the good relationship between Wittgenstein and von
Wright, for to my mind it was difficult to become befriended with “this trange
man”. It’s true that Wittgenstein had also some other good friends, like his
student Elizabeth Anscombe. However, his at first good relationship with
Russell finally broke up, especially because Wittgenstein couldn’t accept
Russell’s different philosophical views.
“First encounter stories are generally fascinating and
frequently bloody”, as H.T.R. Williams writes on listverse.com. But then he
thinks of more or less political meetings, like those between the Romans and
the Gauls or between the Europeans and people outside Europe. Often such
encounters are dramatic if not tragic, indeed. Nevertheless, I think that we
forget most of our own first personal meetings, since they are usually routine
and nothing special. Of all personal encounters we experience in life, we
remember only a few, like the first time we met our future partner. Although
first encounters can have a big impact, most of them are far from dramatic. And
really, in view of the world events that followed from many first meetings in
the political field, also the one between Wittgenstein and von Wright was only
a little bit dramatic; almost melodramatic. Even so, what would have been the
consequences for philosophy, if von Wright had not sent a letter to
Wittgenstein?
Actually, it would be nice if I could meet yet Georg
Henrik von Wright, since I have devoted a big part of my Ph.D. thesis to his action
philosophy. Alas, it will not be possible anymore, for the philosopher died in
2003 in Finland, where he had returned after his professorship in Cambridge.
2003 happened also to be the first time I was in Finland, but then I visited
only shortly a strip of land in the extreme north of the country, far away from
where von Wright lived.
First encounters are often underrated, I think. The
problem is that we have so many of them and often it will be difficult to
foresee their consequences. Most of them are only brief and casual. Also
explicit appointments are usually hardly different. Maybe we should give our
first encounters more attention, even if it is from some kind of autobiographical
curiosity. They say so much about the way we live and the persons we are.
References
Georg Henrik von Wright, “Intellectual autobiography”,
in Paul Arthur Schillp and Lewis Edwin Hahn (eds.), The Philosophy of Georg Henrik von Wright. La Salle, Ill.: Open
Court, 1989.
http://listverse.com/2014/02/17/10-tragic-cross-cultural-first-encounters/
No comments:
Post a Comment