A few weeks ago, I wrote about a forgotten
opera by an almost forgotten German composer: the opera “Siroe, Re di Persia”
by Johann Adolph Hasse. Hadn’t this opera been rediscovered by the Greek
conductor George Petrou, this beautiful piece of art would still have been
hidden in the archives. How many beautiful operas and other pieces of music are
still “waiting” to be brought back to the public? Really, one wouldn’t believe
it today, but also much music by Johann Sebastian Bach was once more or less
forgotten and his son Carl Philippe Emanuel was better known than the father. Also
the now famous composer Antonio Vivaldi was once passed into oblivion.
Being known if not famous and then becoming
forgotten is a common phenomenon. Each age has its own celebrities and one
cannot look always to the past and honour the past celebrities as well. During
the ages the number of celebrities would become so big that there is only one way
to avoid to become overloaded with them: Forget them. When everybody will be
known who is worth to be known, no one will be. In the end there can be only a
few at the top, or everybody would fall down. So many outstanding composers
fell into oblivion, and this happened to many philosophers as well.
The American philosopher Roy Sorensen tells
in one of the mini-essays in his A
Cabinet of Philosophical Curiosities that on a stroll through a graveyard in
Edinburgh, Scotland, he passed the grave of Adam Ferguson, once – two hundred
years ago – a professor of moral philosophy in the University of Edinburg, as
the epitaph told him. He had never heard of him, so for him Ferguson was a
forgotten philosopher. Actually Ferguson is not completely forgotten, for a
building of the University of Edinburgh bears his name. Nevertheless, I think
that for most of us Ferguson belongs to the category of forgotten philosophers,
even though he has a page in the Wikipedia. Should he really have been
forgotten, he wouldn’t even had such a page, but who reads it? However, a
really forgotten philosopher will only be found in the paper archives of the
libraries of universities, courts and monasteries. And when I think of Hasse’s
beautiful opera, I wonder how many philosophical writings of value are hidden there.
Probably a lot. Some may be known be specialized specialists but belong to the
forgotten category for most of us; others are really forgotten. Much research
in the records is to be done! Some forgotten philosophers may be still known by
name, but apart from a few catchwords, nobody knows anymore what they have
written about. Alexander of Abonoteichus, Wilhelm Homberg, Martin Knutzen, Adam
Wodeham: Do you know them? And these are philosophers that can yet be found on
the Internet! Thanks to the web, the chance to be forgotten these days is
smaller than ever before, in the sense that once you are mentioned on the
Internet or once you have published there, all this is public and not hidden in
inaccessible archives. Nevertheless if nobody reads it, you are still
forgotten.
Sorensen tried to find a solution for the
problem that he would be forgotten. Maybe he could be remembered as the
forgotten philosopher, he thought. I hope he will not, or rather that he will
not be remembered as the forgotten
philosopher, for I had reserved this title for myself. But if he will be
remembered as a forgotten
philosopher, it is okay. But perhaps there is a better way for me to prevent
that I’ll sink into oblivion: I can be remembered as the forgotten
philosophical blogger. In view of what I just said about the Internet, my
chances are then better than his – or so I hope –. But Sorensen and I wouldn’t
have been philosophers, if we shouldn’t have to conclude that our tries will
end in a contradiction in terms, for, as he says, “Anyone who is forgotten is
not remembered. I cannot be both remembered and not remembered.” But who cares,
if everybody knows that it is me who has been forgotten?
Reference
Roy Sorensen, “Fame as the Forgotten Philosopher: Meditations
on the Headstone of Adam Ferguson”, in A
Cabinet of Philosophical Curiosities. A Collection of Puzzles, Oddities,
Riddles and Dilemmas. London: Profile Books, 2017; pp. 244-250.
1 comment:
The supposedly second-tier thinkers who are often relegated to footnotes are sometimes less profound or original than the "big names" that have made the canon, but just as often they have seen -- sometimes in passing -- consequences that were not explicit or perhaps even hinted at by the major figures. And "forgetting" happens for all kinds of reasons, not all of which have very much to do with merit -- and "remembering," for reasons that sometimes seem to cheat the odds. Boethius had every reason to think he would be forgotten. Probably several thinkers who headed the Lyceum or the Academy expected their names would live on. Some figures would be much better known - at least, in the West - if they had not written in Chinese or Romanian or etc; but then, maybe in another century or more, the predominant trends will favor them. I have several favorites among the "forgotten," or nearly so, among them Karl Reinhold, Erich Unger, and Anne Conway. Fame has its rationale(s), but as far as philosophy qua philosophy goes, it is entirely incidental.
Post a Comment