A clean Córdoba is a reflection of you
Some philosophers have been forgotten and
can be found back only in the archives. Other philosophers are yet only known
by a few catchwords, but actually nobody knows anymore what they have written
about. Georg Herbert Mead is as a philosopher of the latter kind, I think. Though
he is still well-known among sociologists, most contemporary philosophers don’t
know more about him than that he wrote about the self, I and me; if they do. Among
philosophers he has been forgotten. Anyway, I haven’t come across his name in
the discussions where he is relevant, namely those on the self and personal
identity.
Many people, including philosophers, think that
we are subjects who finally themselves make who they are. Mead doesn’t. For him
a self cannot exist without the presence of others, the views of others and
communication with others, for a self is a reflection of your society, and
especially the people immediately around you. Mead says it this way: “The
individual experiences himself as such, not
directly, but only indirectly, from the particular standpoints of other
individual members of the same social group, or from the generalized standpoint
of the social group as a whole to which he belongs. For he enters his own
experience as a self or individual, not directly or immediately, not by
becoming a subject to himself, but only in so far as he first becomes an object
to himself just as other individuals are objects to him or in his experience;
and he becomes an object to himself only by taking the attitudes of other
individuals toward himself within a social environment or context of experience
and behavior in which both he and they are involved.” (138; italics mine) This
getting to know your self is done via your communication with others, which is
here “a form of behavior in which the organism or the individual may become an
object to himself”, so Mead. (138)
What is striking here is that according to
Mead the self is not a subjective experience but the way others experience us
and the way we reflect on it. The self is objective and socially made: “The
self, as that which can be an object to itself, is essentially a social
structure, and it arises in social experience.” (140) However, seen this way,
the self is only a kind of objective image of a person, constituted by the
society around him – or her, which Mead ignores –. Therefore s/he needs an I:
“The ‘I’ is the response of the organism to the attitudes of the others; the
‘me’ is the organized set of attitudes of others which one himself assumes. The
attitudes of the others constitute the organized ‘me’, and then one reacts toward
that as an ‘I’. ... ‘[I]t is due to the individual’s ability to take the attitudes
of [the] others in so far as they can be organized that he gets
self-consciousness. The taking of all of those organized sets of attitudes
gives him his ‘me’; that is the self he is aware of. ... [However, the]
response to [a] situation as it appears in [the individual’s] immediate
experience is uncertain, and it is that which constitutes the ‘I’.” (175) Briefly,
a person arises in interaction with the social environment and doesn’t exist
without this social environment. Actually we find Mead’s view already in the
idea of the looking glass self, earlier developed by Charles Cooley: The idea
that our self-image arises in an interaction between how we see ourselves and
how others see us. Mead has developed it into a comprehensive theory.
Mead’s view on who we are and how we
develop into who we are is still interesting for philosophers for it shows
important aspects of us and how they come about. We are not our brains, and we
are also not the self-centred subjects who many of us think they are in this Age
of the Ego: We are where we grew up and where we live. Philosophically, for
instance, Mead’s approach implies a criticism on those personal identity theorists
who defend the view that it is our personal continuity in time that makes up
our personality. According to them a person is formed by the subjective experiences
of the past. What they forget, however, is that a person is formed as much by
his or her present interactions with the social environment. A person is not
simply a remembered past. Look in the looking glass of society and you see a
reflection of yourself.
Reference
George Herbert Mead, Mind, Self, and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1974
(1934). The numbers in the text refer to the pages in this book.
No comments:
Post a Comment